Reproduction

The Common Angel shark or Monkfish (Squatina squatina)

Reproduction, essential knowledge

The sexual development for the angelshark population Squatina squatina in the Canary Islands has three main identifiable phases:

Sexual maturity scale for the common angel shark (Squatina squatina) off the Canary Islands. Total length in cm – ElasmoCan.

 

  1. JUVENILE: after birth, there is a growth without development of the reproductive system.

  2. SUBADULT: growth with development of the reproductive organs until adulthood.

  3. ADULT: growth with different phases of reproduction, named the reproductive cycle.

 


Unique behaviour

Reproduction for the common angelshark (Squatina squatina) in the Canary Islands - ElasmoCan. Contradictory to what is known for other angelshark species, the Canary Islands population is not able to reproduce year round. The male reproductive system only allows fertilizing the females during a certain period of the year. This finding is of considerable importance for an efficient management of the species since it allows the definition of a vulnerable period in the reproduction process when the males are sexually active.

A study of Parsons & Grier 1992 suggested that sharks and rays inhabiting areas that show little variation in environmental cues tend to have a continuous sexual activity throughout the year. In this sense, the seasonality of the male fertility in the Canary Islands is even more interesting since they inhabit waters with less temperature changes compared to the other angelshark species.

Read more general information about reproductive biology and sexual maturity scale research in the section Research lines.

Peer reviewed publication Sexual development and maturity scale for the angelshark Squatina squatina, with comments on the adequacy of general maturity scales

The complete study is available at Inter-Research Science Center via DOI 10.3354/sedao00012Sexual development and maturity scale for the angelshark Squatina squatina (Elasmobranchii: Squatinidae), with comments on the adequacy of general maturity scales”.